GUGATAN WANPRESTASI PURCHASE ORDER DALAM PEMASOKAN GARAM
Keywords:
Purchase Order, Agreement, Default, Lawsuit, Salt SupplyAbstract
Purchase Order is a form of agreement made by enterpreneur. Purchase Order is an agreement with the goods supply system through the order process as evidence for the producer that an order transaction has occurred. This achievement must be carried out by the parties which contains giving something, doing something, and not doing something. Based on Article 1243 of the Civil Code, because it does not carry out the achievement, then this can be called a default. Default can also occur in an agreement in the form of a Purchase Order, as happened in the salt supply business relationship through a Purchase Order between PT Indumanis and UD Sumber Lancar due to the non-performance of achievements in the form of payments in accordance with the agreed nominal and time, with an indication of default, the party those who feel aggrieved have the right to file a civil lawsuit to the competent District Court with the argument that the defendant's action of breaking a promise and asking for compensation from the defendant both materially and immaterially, and is obliged to prove the arguments of his lawsuit through evidence and evidence as legal considerations for the Panel of Judges. The author uses doctrinal research methods, with the collection of legal materials for literature study. The results of the answers to the formulation of the problem, namely first, Purchasing Order binds the plaintiff and the defendant in the sale and purchase transaction as an agreement, order letter, and binding sale and purchase. Second, the Defendant's action is categorized as an act of default by not paying the price of the goods according to the agreement. Third, the plaintiff's claim was partially granted by the panel of judges because the plaintiff's petition (demand) did not match the total debt and the plaintiff could not concretely prove the evidence of immaterial losses, so it was considered a lawsuit with unclear legal basis, because claims for immaterial compensation are not detailed based on facts.